Still confused as to why we should memorize these homework words, I asked my teacher why we were “wasting time on something so stupid.” He told me that if I didn`t know them, I wouldn`t even get past a study score above 30, and when he jotted down some practical questions, I understood why. It`s really important that you discuss strengths as well as weaknesses. The reviewers want you to have a balanced discussion in your answers. For this reason, it is difficult for you to come to a really strong overall conclusion on any aspect of the legal system. This means that ultimately, when you come to the conclusion, you are expressing a very balanced opinion, similar to how you began your answer. These task words refer to showing a difference. Unlike “compare”, we only point out the differences and do not mention the similarities. These questions vary in the number of notes listed, but the number of markers and lines on the page allows you to see how much you should write. All of this requires you to look at an institution within the legal system and determine whether it is an effective party. You should start with a general statement.
This statement will be very broad and you will generally say that the institution you are analyzing is both effective and ineffective. Let`s say we answer this question, which asks you to “assess the role of the parties in the adversary litigation system.” You would begin your answer by saying, “While there is certainly room for improvement, the parties play a crucial role in the success of the adversarial litigation system.” Then, in your review, write about the strengths of the system and the weaknesses that correspond to them. If a question is worth eight points, you`ll probably use four strengths and four weaknesses. Discuss a strength, then a weakness, then a strength, then a weakness, and so on. Let us suppose you were asked to evaluate Parliament as a legislator. Make sure your strengths and weaknesses match – in other words, that they are linked. For example, one of the strengths of Parliament is that it can act quickly to amend the law if necessary. One weakness, however, is that Parliament does not always act quickly because it only meets for a certain number of days a year. Task words. They exist, we know that. We pay little attention to them; We listened to them throughout our school careers, didn`t we? “Discuss” this and “describe” that.
We have explained and analyzed since we were in 7th grade, it`s the same thing. This was my attitude in February last year when my teacher gave us a homework word test. It`s safe to say that I got the better of about 40% of them. If you explain where to discuss or analyze where you need to identify, you won`t really get full notes for that question, even if all the information is there. The legal review aims to measure not only what you know about the content, but also how you can answer the question. So how do you know what each task word asks, and how agile do you eat it? Here we provide you with all the definitions for each task word so that you know how to answer each question you are asked. As an example, I will use examples of legal issues here, but this is relevant to many other VCE and QCE topics. As you will see, all the questions asked are quite similar, but pay attention to the slight variation in each answer to the questions. Many VCE and QCE topics contain questions that begin with all sorts of task words. “Define,” “Describe,” and “Identify” all seem to be identical, but there is a difference. So are the terms “analyze”, “evaluate” and “justify”. Knowing the true meanings of all these tasks is a necessity and will or break your tests.
Contrary to popular belief, when you read a question for the first time, the task word is the second most important thing you need to pay attention to. There is a difference between analyzing, discussing and evaluating. You determine everything, whether you should include your own opinion in your answer, how you should structure your answer, or how long your answer should be. This task word simply means to enumerate or specify what the term is. An “identification question” is usually a 1-point question. Quite simply, you test yourself. There is a table of assignment words at the beginning of the law textbook, but if your textbook doesn`t have one, I`ve included a smaller guide here!! Read them all once, cover half of them and ask yourself. Get your friends involved!! Ask each other!! Trust me, your answers will improve exponentially. You know exactly what to say and how much time to spend on each answer, and then you are unstoppable. Example: Identifying a right of an accused. [1 brand] These types of questions first ask you for an opinion. By then asking you to “justify” it, they are asking you to use evidence and an explanation to support your opinion.
When a question asks you to “discuss” something, they really ask you to investigate the problem. You should present both positive and negative arguments on this issue. It is also important to explain whether there is a significant differentiation between the concepts in the question. These types of questions may vary depending on the scores assigned. Analyze, check, discuss and to what extent: These are your long, you need to go into details, explore all sides (pros and cons). There are small differences between all, please be careful. However, there are cases where a closed case is allowed and therefore the public is not allowed to watch. The lack of transparency in these cases can lead to an unfair trial and violate this right of an accused. However, since most cases are pending in public proceedings, the right to a fair trial is largely realized, as it can be considered publicly in most cases.
Example: Alanyse the effectiveness of an accused`s right to a fair trial. [4 points]. In an evaluation question, it is very important to come to a conclusion. You cannot “sit on the fence”. You should compare the pros and cons and then come to a conclusion. It would be a good idea to have an introductory sentence and then a closing paragraph. You will usually have a few different topics in the question that you need to tie together. “Evaluate” questions generally score higher (between 5 and 10). Nevertheless, the right to a jury trial is effective because it is protected by law and article 80 of the Constitution.
Every person charged with a criminal offence and pleading not guilty has the right to a jury trial.
